Stock Revisited - Apple Inc (NASDAQ:AAPL)
Today, we will be revisiting a darling of the stock market - Apple Inc. which trades on the NASDAQ under the symbol AAPL. I last had a look at this stock on July 7th. Back then, the stock was trading at a premium of 12.34% over the sticker price. It wasn’t a Rule #1 company back then and it definitely would not have changed to one now. So why look at this company again?
Super Saver over at My Wealth Builder asked various stock market bloggers to put together an article on Apple Inc. He will be hosting the next Festival of Stocks which will be dedicated to this single stock. Should be an interesting festival!
On with the analysis!
Company Profile:
From Yahoo Finance
Apple Inc., together with its subsidiaries, engages in the design, manufacture, and marketing of personal computers and related software, services, peripherals, and networking solutions worldwide. It also provides a line of portable digital music players, as well as related accessories and services, including online sale of third-party audio and video products. The company’s products and services comprise the Macintosh line of desktop and portable computers; the Mac OS X operating system; the iPod line of portable digital music players; the iTunes Store, a portfolio of peripherals that support and enhance the Macintosh and iPod product lines; a portfolio of consumer and professional software applications; and the Xserve and Xserve RAID server and storage products. In addition, Apple Inc. offers various third-party Macintosh and iPod compatible products, such as application software, printers, storage devices, speakers, headphones, and other accessories and supplies. The company provides an online service to distribute third-party music, audio books, music videos, short films, television shows, movies, and iPod games. Further, it offers products and services for the educational industry, which include iMac and the MacBook, video creation and editing solutions, wireless networking, professional development solutions, and one-to-one learning solutions.
Market capitalization of $122.55B.
Fundamental Analysis:
Right off the bat, Apple shows itself to not be a Rule #1 stock. Management has not delivered a minimum of 10% per year return on invested capital (ROIC) over the last 10 years. In fact, 5 of the last 10 years had an ROIC below 10% and two of those years had NEGATIVE ROIC! The 5 year average ROIC is 12%.
Return on equity (ROE) confirms these results with 5 years returning less than 10% ROE. In fact, the 5 year average ROE is just 9.06%.
Equity growth rate trend does appear to be positive. The 9 year rate is 16.71%. The 5 year rate stays stable at 15.86%. The 3 year rate jumps to 27.66% and last year’s equity growth rate was 30.57%. Really, the last two years have come on very strong with both years producing 30%+ equity growth rates. The years before that (from 2001 to 2004) were sub par to say the least.
And the earnings per share growth rate brings its own set of problems. No less than 2 years (1997 and 2001) delivered NEGATIVE earnings per share. That always throws my calculations off and is another sign of a company that does not belong in the Rule #1 category. But if we just focus on the last 4 years, the EPS growth rate has been absolutely astronomical! The 4 year rate is 132.5%. The 2 year rate is 146% and last year’s EPS growth rate was 53.42%.
The sales growth rate has exhibited Rule #1 behaviour. The 9 year rate is 10.06%. The 5 year rate climbs to 30.64%. The 3 year rate skyrockets to 48.08%. Unfortunately, last year’s growth rate does not improve on that and drops to 38.65%. So not exactly Rule #1 behaviour. But amazing growth rates nonetheless.
Cash flow growth rates have also been incredible. The 8 year rate is a mere 8.66%. The 5 year rate launches to a whopping 87.18%! And the 3 year rate? 118.06%! Last year’s rate comes back down to Earth at 50.36%.
Rule #1 investors look for 10 year histories of improving or steady fundamentals. Although Apple has come on incredibly strong over the last few years, it would not be considered a Rule #1 business.
Stock Analysis:
Let’s have a look at the sticker price.
For my future EPS growth rate, I start with a look at the historical equity growth rate. Of course, the historical information is like a tale of two different companies. Both the 9 year rate and the 5 year rate come in at the 16% rate. However, the last two years have delivered equity growth rates in excess of 30% each. Typically I have always taken the most conservative value. In this case, that would be 15.86%. Analysts have reduced their forecast from the last time I looked at this stock to 21.8%. That definitely seems reasonable by looking at the last couple of years. But I think I will stick with my more conservative estimate.
For my future PE, I start with the default PE which is twice my estimated EPS growth rate. In this case, it works out to 31.72. Looking at the historical PE information, I can see that the 10 year average PE is 38.25 which is in line with the current PE of 39.32. Once again, I will stick with the more conservative value of 31.72.
With this information, my sticker price works out to $120.31. At the current price of $138.41, Mr. Market is demanding a premium of 15.05%. Now, considering that I have erred on the side of caution with both my growth rate and PE, 15% does not seem so far off.
Here are my Rule #1 calculations for AAPL.
Here is the 1 year stock price chart:

AAPL has definitely had a terrific run since July 2007 where it sat around $50.
Conclusion:
Rule #1 methodology is fairly strict. It looks for consistency over a 10 year period which Apple just does not deliver. Apple is more of a momentum stock and it has definitely been on a sweet run over the last couple of years.
I will be interested to see the other methodologies used to evaluate AAPL at next Monday’s Festival of Stocks.
Stay tuned!
Full Disclosure: I do not own shares in AAPL.
If you liked this post, consider buying me a beer.Popularity: 64%
Related posts that may interest you:
If you enjoyed this post, make sure to subscribe to my RSS feed.
Email This Post to a Friend












Momentum stock? It only created the revolutionary iPod, which has sold more than 100M. It only created the iPhone, which will sell more than 100M by the time your Rule #1 Methodology allows you to buy AAPL. By then those $10 a month revenue sharing agreements per iPhone will be kicking in a nice $1B a month extra to Apple’s bottom line. And it’s computer share of approximately 4% leaves plenty of room for growth and that’s the real story.
While your method is fair, it seems to be that you’ll miss the big run-ups in companies like Apple. To each his own though. See you at $600 in a few years. By then maybe your rules will allow you to invest in Apple.
September 19th, 2007 at 9:30 amI am very interested in reading other articles on stocks simular to this one.
September 19th, 2007 at 11:14 amYour not going to find much upside by only looking at historical data. It would also be fair to say that the Nasdaq crunch of 2001 would crush any 10 year review in the tech sector.
The first ford explorer was a lot different than the current one. The first changed the company…the latest one might kill it.
As your model has no methodology to plot changes in the company, you will have to wait 6 more years to finally decide Apple is a good one. Then your model will continue to show it is a stock worth owning long after the bull has been built. This analysis might even recommend Microsoft currently. Which is off over 10% from when it Launched their flagship product Vista.
As your model does not factor what makes the company tick other than old history, I can’t imagine it working in a dynamic environment like Technology.
My recommendation would be to analyze growth like Bank stocks for your wealth accumulation using this model technique.
I don’t know your system well enough but I have seen enough. Happy hunting.
September 19th, 2007 at 1:07 pmThe data for AAPL is discontinuos over the last 10 years. Apple is a different company since 2003. Your 10 year analysis makes no sense for Apple, and I suspect many other tech stocks. Using that your system of analysis would mean that you would find an explosive investment like AAPL many years too late.
I invested in AAPL in 2003, recognizing that the fundamentals and direction of the company had shifted, in addition to the competition (Microsoft) becoming moribund. Using your system I’d have missed out on the 1500% profits I’ve enjoyed since 2003.
September 19th, 2007 at 1:25 pmWow. Lots of backlash over the Apple Inc article!
In fact, I received one comment that could not be printed as this is a family blog!
First of all, I use the Rule #1 methodology as specified in Phil Town’s book “Rule #1“. I did not create the methodology. I use it to analyze stocks. I like it because it takes a disciplined approach to looking at stocks.
Secondly, I never said that Apple was a bad stock. I know it has been a great stock. I clearly called it the ‘darling of the stock market.’ All I said was that it does not meet Rule #1 criteria. There is nothing negative about that comment.
Just like an investor who follows a dividend growth strategy, they would not find Apple Inc an appealing stock. Why? Because it doesn’t meet their investment criteria.
So why did I choose to analyze Apple? It definitely would not come out of a Rule #1 stock screen. But like I said at the top of the article, Super Saver at My Wealth Builder is hosting a festival and the topic is on Apple Inc. so I offered to run it through the Rule #1 methodology so that it could be used to compare to other methodologies from the other bloggers.
I agree with Greg that this methodology is unlikely to find Tech stocks due to the Tech meltdown since it will affect the 10 year numbers. However, GRMN did meet the Rule #1 criteria. GOOG does not have 10 years of history so it can’t be analyzed using this method.
Sorry for the rant.
Average Joe
September 19th, 2007 at 9:29 pmUsing Rule #1 metrics to rate stocks like Apple is a genuine waste of time. Our favorite fruit has not been a stock market darling through most of it’s history, in fact most analysts have said at one time or another (usually more than once, years apart) that Apple would cease to exist. It seems unlikely now but is indeed true.
Apple as an earning entity is just now starting to wake the beast that is the institutional manager. It is true most have positions but could increase the percentage very significantly. In the next year or two Mr. Toad will have these folks looking to safe havens in the tech sector. Companies with substantial & growing cash, a simply killer pipe, consistent demand, etc. Apple, Cisco and a few others are no-brainers here. It will be a bumpy ride, the thing to remember is if any tech is going to be up long-term it will be companies like these.
September 20th, 2007 at 4:13 am